👨🏫Audit Report
Audit Details Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to specification and best practices.
Audit Scope
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.
We will verify the following claims:
Correct implementation of Token standard
Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
Deployer cannot pause the contract
Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Last updated
